
Don’t Just Tell Me What’s Broken, Tell Me Why…
We’ve all been there. You’re wrestling with a frustrating technical issue, finally stumble upon a knowledge base article, and breathe a sigh of relief. But then you start reading, and while it meticulously details the symptoms and the solution, a crucial piece of the puzzle is missing: the cause.
As a user, I don’t necessarily need to know the intricate engineering reasons why your system glitched out. What I do need to understand is what action, setting, or circumstance on my end might have led to this problem.
Think about it. You’re trying to fix a leaky faucet. An article that simply tells you to replace the washer is helpful, sure. But wouldn’t it be even more valuable if it also mentioned:
- “This issue often occurs after a sudden change in water pressure.” (Something I might have experienced.)
- “Incorrectly tightening the faucet handle after previous use can sometimes damage the washer.” (A potential action of mine.)
- “If your plumbing is older, the washer may have simply deteriorated over time.” (A circumstance I might be aware of.)
See the difference? These potential causes, even if not the exact root technical reason for the washer failure, provide crucial context from my perspective as the user.
Why is identifying the cause (from the user’s view) so important in a knowledge base article?
- Empowerment and Understanding: Knowing the potential cause helps me understand why I encountered the problem. It transforms me from a passive recipient of a solution to someone who understands the situation better. This understanding can be incredibly empowering and reduce frustration.
- Prevention: If I understand what might have triggered the issue, I can take steps to avoid it in the future. Maybe I’ll be more careful when adjusting water pressure, or I’ll know to get my older plumbing checked. This proactive approach saves me time and headaches down the line.
- Faster Diagnosis (Sometimes): Even if the article doesn’t pinpoint the exact root cause, understanding potential user-facing triggers can help me reflect on my recent actions and potentially narrow down the source of the problem. “Oh, I did recently install that new software…”
- Increased Trust: When a knowledge base article acknowledges the user’s experience and tries to explain the issue from their viewpoint, it builds trust. It shows that you’re not just providing a fix, but you’re also trying to help the user understand and learn.
- Reduced Support Tickets: By addressing potential user-driven causes in your documentation, you can anticipate common questions and prevent users from needing to reach out to support.
Even if you don’t know the exact, deep-seated technical reason…
That’s okay! You can still provide valuable information about potential user-facing triggers. Think about:
- Common user actions that precede the issue: Did the user just install new software? Change a setting? Upload a large file?
- Environmental factors: Is this issue more likely to occur on a specific operating system? After a system update? During peak usage times?
- User configurations: Could a particular setting or configuration choice lead to this problem?
Remember, the goal isn’t to explain the intricacies of your system’s architecture. The goal is to help me, the user, understand why I might be seeing this issue and how I can potentially prevent it in the future.
So, the next time you’re crafting a knowledge base article, take a moment to step into your user’s shoes. Think about what they might have done, what they might have experienced, that could have led to the problem. Providing this context, even without a definitive root cause, will significantly enhance the value and effectiveness of your documentation. Your users will thank you for it!